Model comparison

Llama 13b vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama 13b Meta

23.9

Rank #344 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

47.3

Rank #54 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 62.4 to 13.9.
  • Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 13b and Qwen3.6 Plus specifications
Llama 13bQwen3.6 Plus
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index23.947.3
Released2023-02-242026-03-31
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$3
Results tracked2137

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332), Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.6 (#125)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Coding6831467
SWE-bench Verified—57.9%
LMArena WebDev—1461
SciCode—40.7%
ALE-Bench—670.15

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.6 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—5,115

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327), Qwen3.6 Plus: 28.5 (#89)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts7281449
Epoch Capabilities Index100.09147.67
NYT Connections (extended)—60.3%
CritPt—2.9%
Chess Puzzles—17%
Thematic Generalization—59.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—12%
DTBench—81.9%
LMCA—33.1%
BIG-Bench Hard37.9%—
HellaSwag79.2%—
LAMBADA75.2%—
PIQA80.1%—
WinoGrande73%—

Math Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259), Qwen3.6 Plus: 50.6 (#44)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Math8381450
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—38.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—26.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—8.3%
GSM8K20.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#40)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.6 Plus
GPQA Diamond—88.4%
SimpleQA Verified—44.1%
LMArena Expert—1456
ARC (AI2) Challenge52.7%—
BoolQ78.7%—
MMLU47.7%—
OpenBookQA56.4%—
TriviaQA77.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.6 Plus
ScienceQA43.3%—

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292), Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.5 (#66)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Non-English8191424
LMArena Chinese—1478
LMArena French—1454
LMArena German—1451
LMArena Japanese—1389
LMArena Korean—1381
LMArena Russian—1434
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300), Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.2 (#70)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following7811425

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.1 (#48)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.6 Plus
CL-bench—20.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1440

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307), Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.4 (#78)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text8341437
LMArena Creative Writing7941405
LMArena Multi-Turn7531438

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 13b better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 13b or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper