Model comparison

Llama 2-70B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Llama 2-70B Meta

24.1

Rank #343 Confirmed

Qwen3-30B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

38.5

Rank #174 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-70B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-30B-A3B in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-30B-A3B leads 41.7 to 7.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0% for Llama 2-70B and 70.3% for Qwen3-30B-A3B.

Side by side

Llama 2-70B and Qwen3-30B-A3B specifications
Llama 2-70BQwen3-30B-A3B
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index24.138.5
Released2023-07-182025-04-28
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—41K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.12
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked3532

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Llama 2-70B: 30.8 (#281), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.0 (#188)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Coding10791416
SciCode—33.3%
WeirdML—29.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 2-70B: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.5 (#75)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BQwen3-30B-A3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41.4%

Reasoning Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Llama 2-70B: 13.7 (#324), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 21.6 (#193)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts10731398
DTBench41.6%69.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index113.59139.63
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—8%
LMCA—22.4%
BIG-Bench Hard64.9%—
CommonsenseQA 2.050%—
ForecastBench51.4—
HellaSwag85.3%—
LAMBADA78.9%—
PIQA82.8%—
WinoGrande80.2%—

Math Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Llama 2-70B: 7.5 (#320), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 36.0 (#133)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BQwen3-30B-A3B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250%70.3%
LMArena Math10911394
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—47.8%
MATH Level 53.3%—
GSM8K69.6%—

Knowledge Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#305), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.7 (#96)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BQwen3-30B-A3B
GPQA Diamond26.3%70.1%
LMArena Expert10391395
Confabulations—12.3%
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ88.6%—
MMLU69.9%—
OpenBookQA60.2%—
TriviaQA87.6%—

Multilingual Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Llama 2-70B: 27.9 (#269), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.8 (#126)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Non-English10451372
LMArena Chinese9941434
LMArena French10891419
LMArena German10411379
LMArena Japanese9271338
LMArena Korean9641333
LMArena Russian10831369
LMArena Spanish11421403

Instruction Following Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Llama 2-70B: 55.1 (#273), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.2 (#137)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following10711364

Long Context Llama 2-70B leads

Llama 2-70B: 32.2 (#265), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#278)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query10621379
Fiction.LiveBench—40.6%

Writing & Preference Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Llama 2-70B: 32.5 (#274), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.9 (#138)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Text11151384
LMArena Creative Writing10751318
LMArena Multi-Turn10881378
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 2-70B better than Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 2-70B or Qwen3-30B-A3B better for coding?

Qwen3-30B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 30.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 2-70B and Qwen3-30B-A3B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper