Model comparison

Llama 13b vs Qwen3-30B-A3B

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama 13b Meta

24.4

Rank #348 Confirmed

Qwen3-30B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

38.9

Rank #179 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-30B-A3B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-30B-A3B leads 55.6 to 13.8.

Side by side

Llama 13b and Qwen3-30B-A3B specifications
Llama 13bQwen3-30B-A3B
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index24.438.9
Released2023-02-242025-04-28
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—41K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.12
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked2132

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.5 (#194)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Coding6831416
SciCode—33.3%
WeirdML—29.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.8 (#82)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3-30B-A3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41.4%

Reasoning Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 22.2 (#204)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts7281398
Epoch Capabilities Index100.58139.63
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—8%
DTBench—69.3%
LMCA—22.4%
BIG-Bench Hard37.9%—
HellaSwag79.2%—
LAMBADA75.2%—
PIQA80.1%—
WinoGrande73%—

Math Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.4 (#157)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Math8381394
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—47.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—70.3%
GSM8K20.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.8 (#105)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3-30B-A3B
GPQA Diamond—70.1%
Confabulations—12.3%
LMArena Expert—1396
ARC (AI2) Challenge52.7%—
BoolQ78.7%—
MMLU47.7%—
OpenBookQA56.4%—
TriviaQA77.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3-30B-A3B
ScienceQA43.3%—

Multilingual Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.5 (#132)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Non-English8191372
LMArena Chinese—1433
LMArena French—1418
LMArena German—1380
LMArena Japanese—1337
LMArena Korean—1331
LMArena Russian—1370
LMArena Spanish—1404

Instruction Following Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.0 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following7811363

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#283)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3-30B-A3B
Fiction.LiveBench—40.6%
LMArena Longer Query—1379

Writing & Preference Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.6 (#143)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Text8341384
LMArena Creative Writing7941317
LMArena Multi-Turn7531378
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 13b better than Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 13b or Qwen3-30B-A3B better for coding?

Qwen3-30B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.5 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Qwen3-30B-A3B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper