Model comparison
Llama 2-70B vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 21.3 to 7.5.
Side by side
| Llama 2-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 24.1 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 35 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 2-70B leads
Llama 2-70B: 30.8 (#281), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1079 | — |
Reasoning OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 2-70B: 13.7 (#324), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | — |
| DTBench | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 64.9% | — |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | 50% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.59 | — |
| ForecastBench | 51.4 | — |
| HellaSwag | 85.3% | — |
| LAMBADA | 78.9% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
| PIQA | 82.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.2% | — |
Math OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 2-70B: 7.5 (#320), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1091 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 3.3% | — |
| GSM8K | 69.6% | — |
Knowledge OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#305), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 26.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 88.6% | — |
| MMLU | 69.9% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 60.2% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.6% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 2-70B: 27.9 (#269), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1045 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 994 | — |
| LMArena French | 1089 | — |
| LMArena German | 1041 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 927 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 964 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1142 | — |
Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 2-70B: 55.1 (#273), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1071 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 2-70B: 32.2 (#265), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1062 | — |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 2-70B: 32.5 (#274), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1115 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1075 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-70B better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 2-70B or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Llama 2-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.8 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-70B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.