Model comparison

Llama 2-70B vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Llama 2-70B Meta

24.4

Rank #349 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 26.8 to 8.1.

Side by side

Llama 2-70B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Llama 2-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderMetaAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index24.432.7
Released2023-07-18—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3516

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding10791210

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10731208
DTBench41.6%—
BIG-Bench Hard64.9%—
CommonsenseQA 2.050%—
Epoch Capabilities Index113.79—
ForecastBench51.4—
HellaSwag85.3%—
LAMBADA78.9%—
PIQA82.8%—
WinoGrande80.2%—

Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math10911208
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250%—
Omni-MATH—16.1%
MATH Level 53.3%—
GSM8K69.6%—

Knowledge Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
GPQA Diamond26.3%—
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1039—
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ88.6%—
MMLU69.9%—
OpenBookQA60.2%—
TriviaQA87.6%—

Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English10451160
LMArena Chinese9951192
LMArena Russian10831187
LMArena French1090—
LMArena German1041—
LMArena Japanese927—
LMArena Korean964—
LMArena Spanish1143—

Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10711186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10621194

Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text11151218
LMArena Creative Writing10751199
LMArena Multi-Turn10881221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 2-70B better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 2-70B or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 2-70B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper