Model comparison
Llama 2-70B vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-70B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 39.7 to 7.4.
Side by side
| Llama 2-70B | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 35 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1079 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| DTBench | 41.6% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 64.9% | — |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | 50% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.79 | — |
| ForecastBench | 51.4 | — |
| HellaSwag | 85.3% | — |
| LAMBADA | 78.9% | — |
| PIQA | 82.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.2% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1091 | 1396 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 3.3% | — |
| GSM8K | 69.6% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1425 |
| GPQA Diamond | 26.3% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 88.6% | — |
| MMLU | 69.9% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 60.2% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.6% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1045 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 995 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1090 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1041 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 927 | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | 964 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1083 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1143 | 1420 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1071 | 1392 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1062 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1115 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1075 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-70B better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 2-70B or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-70B and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.