Model comparison
Llama 2-13B vs Phi-3.5-mini
Llama 2-13B has enough public results to be ranked (#304); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Meta
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 0 categories and Phi-3.5-mini in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Phi-3.5-mini leads 34.0 to 30.4.
Side by side
| Llama 2-13B | Phi-3.5-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 36.4 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2024-08-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 32 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi-3.5-mini leads
Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.0 (#231)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| PIQA | 80.8% | 81% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | — |
| DTBench | 42.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 105.8 | — |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | — |
Math Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 36.9% | 86.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1065 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BoolQ | 82.4% | 78% |
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | — |
| MMLU | 55.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | — |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: —, Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | — |
| LMArena French | 1043 | — |
| LMArena German | 1009 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1086 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1046 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1085 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-13B better than Phi-3.5-mini?
Llama 2-13B has enough public results to be ranked (#304); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Llama 2-13B or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?
Phi-3.5-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.0 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Phi-3.5-mini share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.