Model comparison
Llama 2-13B vs Nova Premier 1.0
Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nova Premier 1.0 leads 51.0 to 29.8.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 2-13B | Nova Premier 1.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 38.3 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2025-04-30 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 10K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $12.50 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | — |
Reasoning Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337), Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 44.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | — |
| DTBench | 42.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 106.17 | — |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | — |
| PIQA | 80.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | — |
Math Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229), Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 35% |
| LMArena Math | 1065 | — |
| GSM8K | 36.9% | — |
Knowledge Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249), Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 72.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 51.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.4% | — |
| MMLU | 55.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | — |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: —, Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | — |
| LMArena French | 1044 | — |
| LMArena German | 1009 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1087 | — |
Instruction Following Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287), Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 80.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1045 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | — |
Writing & Preference Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289), Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | — |
| WildBench | — | 78.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-13B better than Nova Premier 1.0?
Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Nova Premier 1.0 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Nova Premier 1.0 has 6.