Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Nova Premier 1.0
Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nova Premier 1.0 leads 51.0 to 24.0.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Nova Premier 1.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 38.3 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2025-04-30 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 10K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $12.50 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 44.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 35% |
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 72.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 51.8% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |
Instruction Following Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 80.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |
Writing & Preference Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | — |
| WildBench | — | 78.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Nova Premier 1.0?
Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Nova Premier 1.0 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Nova Premier 1.0 has 6.