Model comparison

Claude 2 vs o1-mini

o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 1 category and o1-mini in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where o1-mini leads 35.4 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for Claude 2 and 89.2% for o1-mini.

Side by side

Claude 2 and o1-mini specifications
Claude 2o1-mini
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index25.034.0
Released2023-07-112024-09-12
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked839

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o1-mini
HumanEval+61.6%89%
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
WeirdML—36.3%
LiveBench Coding—48%
LMArena Coding—1362
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o1-mini
Cybench—10%

Reasoning Claude 2 leads

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o1-mini
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13135.82
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
ARC-AGI-1—14%
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1333
DTBench51.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
LiveBench—57.8%

Math o1-mini leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o1-mini
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%46.9%
MATH Level 511.7%89.2%
LiveBench Math—62%
LMArena Math—1358
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge o1-mini leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o1-mini
GPQA Diamond34.7%62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%
LMArena Expert—1316
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o1-mini
LMArena Non-English—1289
LMArena Chinese—1314
LMArena French—1293
LMArena German—1278
LMArena Japanese—1245
LMArena Korean—1223
LMArena Russian—1283
LMArena Spanish—1303

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o1-mini
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1304

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o1-mini
LMArena Longer Query—1320

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o1-mini
LMArena Text—1317
LMArena Creative Writing—1244
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1314
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than o1-mini?

o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and o1-mini share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper