Model comparison
Llama 13b vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.5 to 13.8.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 13b | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2023-02-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | — |
Reasoning Llama 13b leads
Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.58 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |
Math Not comparable
Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | — |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 13b better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.