Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

Mistral Medium 3.1 Mistral AI

31.9

Rank #266 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude 2 leads 21.7 to 10.6.

Side by side

Claude 2Mistral Medium 3.1
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Noometry Index25.031.9
Released2023-07-11—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—131K
Max output—105K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked83

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Mistral Medium 3.1: —

BenchmarkClaude 2Mistral Medium 3.1
HumanEval+61.6%—

Reasoning Claude 2 leads

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)

BenchmarkClaude 2Mistral Medium 3.1
NYT Connections (extended)—6.5%
Thematic Generalization—20.3%
DTBench51.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13—

Math Not comparable

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

BenchmarkClaude 2Mistral Medium 3.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

BenchmarkClaude 2Mistral Medium 3.1
GPQA Diamond34.7%—
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)

BenchmarkClaude 2Mistral Medium 3.1
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1476

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Mistral Medium 3.1?

Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper