Model comparison
Llama 13b vs Magistral Medium
Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Mistral AISummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 1 category and Magistral Medium in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Magistral Medium leads 46.3 to 13.8.
Side by side
| Llama 13b | Magistral Medium | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 35.2 |
| Released | 2023-02-24 | 2025-03-17 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $5 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Magistral Medium leads
Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337), Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1319 |
| SciCode | — | 39.2% |
Reasoning Llama 13b leads
Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329), Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1267 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 16.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 6.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.58 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |
Math Magistral Medium leads
Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256), Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1250 |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1223 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, Magistral Medium: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |
Multilingual Magistral Medium leads
Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297), Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1232 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1227 |
| LMArena French | — | 1267 |
| LMArena German | — | 1248 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1125 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1224 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Magistral Medium leads
Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305), Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1254 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1295 |
Writing & Preference Magistral Medium leads
Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312), Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1255 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1245 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 13b better than Magistral Medium?
Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 13b or Magistral Medium better for coding?
Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Magistral Medium share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.