Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Llama 13b
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 74.4 to 36.7.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 24.4 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 683 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 728 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 100.58 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 838 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 79.7% | 47.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 781 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 753 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Llama 13b?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Llama 13b better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.4 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Llama 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.