Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 50.5 to 21.1.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2026-06-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1473 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1460 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |
Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1466 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1467 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1510 |
| LMArena French | — | 1473 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1440 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (36.6 vs 36.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.