Model comparison
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Laguna M.1
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
PoolsideSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 3 categories and Laguna M.1 in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 47.4 to 21.1.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Laguna M.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Poolside |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 32.5 |
| Released | 2025-11-06 | 2026-04-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178), Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | 1349 |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75), Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68), Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| LMArena Math | 1429 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | — |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Laguna M.1?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Laguna M.1 better for coding?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Laguna M.1 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.