Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5 Plus
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 21.1.
- Qwen3.5 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.78 |
Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.5 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.