Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Qwen2-72B
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Laguna M.1 leads 36.4 to 28.7.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Qwen2-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 29.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2024-06-07 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195), Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1348 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1196 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187), Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1191 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.27 |
Math Qwen2-72B leads
Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276), Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1171 |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1240 |
| LMArena French | — | 1169 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1168 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1181 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1193 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1195 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Qwen2-72B?
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or Qwen2-72B better for coding?
Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Qwen2-72B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.