Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Laguna M.1
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
PoolsideSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 7B leads 31.2 to 21.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | Laguna M.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 32.5 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2026-04-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Laguna M.1 leads
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| LMArena Math | 1066 | — |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | — |
| LMArena French | 1025 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Laguna M.1?
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 7B or Laguna M.1 better for coding?
Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Laguna M.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.