Model comparison

Laguna M.1 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Laguna M.1 Poolside

31.9

Rank #252 Reported

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 Alibaba (Qwen)

38.1

Rank #179 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 33.5 to 20.3.
  • Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Laguna M.1 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 specifications
Laguna M.1Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
ProviderPoolsideAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.938.1
Released2026-04-28—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked314

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena WebDev1348—
LMArena Coding—1314

Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Hard Prompts—1299
Surface Evolver Bench15.6%—

Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
ProofBench0%—
LMArena Math—1298

Knowledge Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Expert—1289

Multilingual Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Non-English—1265
LMArena Chinese—1314
LMArena German—1231
LMArena Japanese—1207
LMArena Russian—1271

Instruction Following Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Instruction Following—1275

Long Context Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Longer Query—1292

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Text—1299
LMArena Creative Writing—1262
LMArena Multi-Turn—1299

Frequently asked questions

Is Laguna M.1 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Laguna M.1 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper