Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Qwen1.5-110B
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 33.7 to 21.1.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 34.2 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1168 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math Qwen1.5-110B leads
Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1185 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1206 |
| LMArena French | — | 1151 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1142 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1158 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Qwen1.5-110B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.