Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 33.8 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 33K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195), Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1348 | — |
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187), Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
Math Not comparable
Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (36.4 vs 35.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.