Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Phi-3.5-mini
Laguna M.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#252); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
MicrosoftSide by side
| Laguna M.1 | Phi-3.5-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 36.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2024-08-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.0 (#231)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1348 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |
Math Not comparable
Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BoolQ | — | 78% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Phi-3.5-mini?
Laguna M.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#252); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Laguna M.1 or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?
Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Phi-3.5-mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.