Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
PoolsideSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 37.4 to 20.3.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 44.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1348 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1516 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1481 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1477 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1516 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1266 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1501 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1424 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1463 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1465 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1459 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1408 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.