Noometry

Model comparison

Command R+ vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 36.5 to 9.2.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Command R+MiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderCohereXiaomi
Noometry Index32.448.5
Released2024-08-302026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K1.05M
Max output4K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.28
Results tracked3419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding11871504
LMArena WebDev—1637
SciCode—51.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts11861482
SimpleBench17.4%—
CritPt—12%
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math11881468
ProofBench—63%
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert11741501
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Command R+: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English12161434
LMArena Chinese12261511
LMArena French12091475
LMArena Russian12271409
LMArena Spanish11891456
LMArena German1216—
LMArena Japanese1166—
LMArena Korean1138—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following11971463
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query12301463

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text12291455
LMArena Creative Writing12351400
LMArena Multi-Turn12131451
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command R+ or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper