Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Llama 3.1-405B
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Laguna M.1 leads 21.9 to 16.4.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.1-405B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 30.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2024-07-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 42 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195), Llama 3.1-405B: 32.7 (#257)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1348 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 21.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1291 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 20.9 (#131)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 7.4% |
| Cybench | — | 7.5% |
Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187), Llama 3.1-405B: 16.4 (#293)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 23% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 45% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1270 |
| DTBench | — | 61.4% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 82.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.76 |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.9 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89.2% |
| PIQA | — | 85.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 89.2% |
Math Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276), Llama 3.1-405B: 17.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 9.7% |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 24.9% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1281 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 49.8% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#221)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 50.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 72.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 17.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 52.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1243 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 95.3% |
| MMLU | — | 84.5% |
| TriviaQA | — | 82.7% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 40.9 (#209)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1248 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1242 |
| LMArena French | — | 1278 |
| LMArena German | — | 1252 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1208 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1184 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1259 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 66.1 (#209)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 81.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1259 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1266 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 39.1 (#246)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1284 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 870 |
| WildBench | — | 78.3% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1297 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Llama 3.1-405B?
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or Llama 3.1-405B better for coding?
Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 32.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Llama 3.1-405B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-405B has 42.