Model comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs Laguna M.1

Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 27B Google

30.8

Rank #284 Confirmed

Laguna M.1 Poolside

32.5

Rank #256 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Laguna M.1 leads 36.6 to 22.5.
  • Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Gemma 3 27B and Laguna M.1 specifications
Gemma 3 27BLaguna M.1
ProviderGooglePoolside
Noometry Index30.832.5
Released2025-03-112026-04-28
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K262K
Max output8K33K
Input $ / M tokens$0.08—
Output $ / M tokens$0.16—
Results tracked433

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Laguna M.1 leads

Gemma 3 27B: 22.5 (#334), Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLaguna M.1
Aider Polyglot4.9%—
LMArena WebDev—1349
SciCode21.2%—
LiveBench Coding39.9%—
LMArena Coding1322—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 25.1 (#110), Laguna M.1: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLaguna M.1
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard29.5%—

Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads

Gemma 3 27B: 16.7 (#301), Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLaguna M.1
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning43.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1340—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis51.5%—
LMCA12.3%—
Surface Evolver Bench—15.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index130.04—
LiveBench50%—

Math Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 25.9 (#265), Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLaguna M.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202522.5%—
ProofBench—0%
LiveBench Math55.4%—
LMArena Math1312—
MATH Level 574%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 25.5 (#261), Laguna M.1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLaguna M.1
GPQA Diamond47.7%—
Confabulations40.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
LMArena Expert1304—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 32.6 (#100), Laguna M.1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLaguna M.1
LMArena Vision1164—
GeoBench52%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 46.9 (#155), Laguna M.1: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLaguna M.1
LMArena Non-English1334—
LMArena Chinese1346—
LMArena French1368—
LMArena German1362—
LMArena Japanese1287—
LMArena Korean1308—
LMArena Russian1349—
LMArena Spanish1349—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 70.6 (#160), Laguna M.1: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLaguna M.1
LiveBench Instruction Following74.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following1321—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#293), Laguna M.1: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLaguna M.1
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%—
LMArena Longer Query1333—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 52.5 (#168), Laguna M.1: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLaguna M.1
LMArena Text1358—
LMArena Creative Writing1346—
Short-Story Creative Writing79.9%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1266—
LMArena Multi-Turn1345—
LiveBench Language34.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 27B better than Laguna M.1?

Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 27B or Laguna M.1 better for coding?

Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 22.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and Laguna M.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper