Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Llama 2-7B
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama 2-7B leads 30.7 to 21.1.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 29.1 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204), Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1002 |
Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184), Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1009 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 39.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 99.06 |
| HellaSwag | — | 77.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 73.3% |
| PIQA | — | 78.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 69.2% |
Math Llama 2-7B leads
Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283), Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1042 |
| GSM8K | — | 16.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1036 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 45.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 77.9% |
| MMLU | — | 45.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 2-7B: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.1% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 973 |
| LMArena French | — | 970 |
| LMArena German | — | 978 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 995 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1007 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1006 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 999 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1053 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1029 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Llama 2-7B?
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or Llama 2-7B better for coding?
Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Llama 2-7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.