Model comparison

Kimi K3 vs Mercury

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Mercury Inception

37.6

Rank #199 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K3 scores higher in 6 categories and Mercury in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K3 leads 63.0 to 17.5.
  • Kimi K3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Kimi K3 and Mercury specifications
Kimi K3Mercury
ProviderMoonshot AIInception
Noometry Index59.537.6
Released2026-07-16—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output1.05M—
Input $ / M tokens$3—
Output $ / M tokens$15—
Results tracked539

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10), Mercury: 38.7 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Mercury
LMArena Coding15081322
DeepSWE68.5%—
FrontierCode44.2%—
LMArena WebDev1654—
FrontierSWE25.9%—
SciCode59.5%—
WeirdML82.6%—
ALE-Bench1,524—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20), Mercury: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Mercury
APEX-Agents50.6%—
τ²-bench Banking37.1%—
PostTrainBench32%—
GBAEval48.3%—
GDP.pdf19%—
Vending-Bench 25,165—

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17), Mercury: 17.5 (#293)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Mercury
LMArena Hard Prompts14961285
ARC-AGI-260.4%—
SimpleBench60.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—21.6%
NYT Connections (extended)93.6%—
ARC-AGI-194.5%—
CritPt23.4%—
Chess Puzzles39%—
Mystery Game Puzzles26%—
DTBench91.2%—
LMCA52.7%—
Surface Evolver Bench95%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.45—
ForecastBench61.1—

Math Not comparable

Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16), Mercury: —

Knowledge Not comparable

Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21), Mercury: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Mercury
GPQA Diamond93.1%—
SimpleQA Verified50.6%—
LMArena Expert1521—

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70), Mercury: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Mercury
Blueprint-Bench 229.5%—
Furniture Assembly34.2%—

Multilingual Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21), Mercury: 41.6 (#206)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Mercury
LMArena Non-English14661260
LMArena Chinese1529—
LMArena French1491—
LMArena German1488—
LMArena Japanese1487—
LMArena Korean1458—
LMArena Russian1482—
LMArena Spanish1472—

Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14), Mercury: 65.2 (#224)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Mercury
LMArena Instruction Following14831239

Long Context Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29), Mercury: 38.4 (#198)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Mercury
LMArena Longer Query14941266

Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4), Mercury: 46.2 (#221)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Mercury
LMArena Text14761282
LMArena Creative Writing14541191
LMArena Multi-Turn14881282
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2082—
EQ-Bench 41339—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K3 better than Mercury?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K3 or Mercury better for coding?

Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.0 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K3 and Mercury share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K3 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper