Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Mercury

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Mercury Inception

37.6

Rank #199 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Mercury in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 17.5.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashMercury
ProviderGoogleInception
Noometry Index59.837.6
Released2026-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked449

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Mercury: 38.7 (#170)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashMercury
LMArena Coding14971322
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Mercury: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashMercury
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Mercury: 17.5 (#293)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashMercury
LMArena Hard Prompts14941285
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—21.6%
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Mercury: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashMercury
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1507—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Mercury: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashMercury
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
LMArena Expert1508—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Mercury: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashMercury
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Mercury: 41.6 (#206)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashMercury
LMArena Non-English14841260
LMArena Chinese1548—
LMArena French1505—
LMArena German1498—
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Korean1483—
LMArena Russian1516—
LMArena Spanish1503—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Mercury: 65.2 (#224)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashMercury
LMArena Instruction Following14831239

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Mercury: 38.4 (#198)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashMercury
LMArena Longer Query14921266

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Mercury: 46.2 (#221)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashMercury
LMArena Text14861282
LMArena Creative Writing14901191
LMArena Multi-Turn14891282
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Mercury?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Mercury better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mercury share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper