Model comparison

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) vs o1-pro

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) Moonshot AI

41.2

Rank #140 Confirmed

o1-pro OpenAI

31.5

Rank #271 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 37.3 to 29.7.
  • Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is cheaper at $0.57 / $2.30 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
  • Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
  • Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and o1-pro specifications
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)o1-pro
ProviderMoonshot AIOpenAI
Noometry Index41.231.5
Released2025-07-122025-03-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K200K
Max output262K100K
Input $ / M tokens$0.57$150
Output $ / M tokens$2.30$600
Results tracked423

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.4 (#102), o1-pro: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)o1-pro
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)63.4%—
Aider Polyglot59.1%—
GSO4.9%—
WeirdML42.8%—
LMArena Coding1399—
ALE-Bench597.5—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.4 (#64), o1-pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)o1-pro
Terminal-Bench35.7%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard59.1%—
METR Time Horizons59.2%—

Reasoning Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 23.3 (#179), o1-pro: 20.4 (#239)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)o1-pro
SimpleBench26.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark64.4%—
ARC-AGI-1—23.3%
EnigmaEval—6.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts1384—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.01—
ForecastBench60.2—

Math Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.7 (#83), o1-pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)o1-pro
Omni-MATH65.4%—
LMArena Math1397—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)21.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 37.3 (#157), o1-pro: 29.7 (#234)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)o1-pro
Humanity's Last Exam—8.1%
MMLU-Pro81.9%—
Confabulations20.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate17.9%—
GPQA (HELM)65.3%—
LMArena Expert1365—

Multilingual Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.6 (#130), o1-pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)o1-pro
LMArena Non-English1372—
LMArena Chinese1415—
LMArena French1379—
LMArena German1387—
LMArena Japanese1349—
LMArena Korean1325—
LMArena Russian1385—
LMArena Spanish1386—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.1 (#156), o1-pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)o1-pro
IFEval85%—
LMArena Instruction Following1348—

Long Context Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#145), o1-pro: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)o1-pro
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—
CL-bench17.6%—
LMArena Longer Query1353—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.3 (#78), o1-pro: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)o1-pro
LMArena Text1380—
LMArena Creative Writing1350—
Short-Story Creative Writing85.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1666—
WildBench86.2%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1371—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better than o1-pro?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or o1-pro?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is cheaper. It lists at $0.57 per million input tokens and $2.30 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.

Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) does, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and o1-pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper