Model comparison
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Yi-Lightning
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-Lightning in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 35.4.
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Yi-Lightning | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2025-11-06 | 2024-12-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178), Yi-Lightning: 27.4 (#320)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1312 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 12.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75), Yi-Lightning: 25.9 (#139)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1302 |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68), Yi-Lightning: 36.2 (#172)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1300 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69), Yi-Lightning: 35.4 (#185)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1286 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109), Yi-Lightning: 42.2 (#196)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1269 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1320 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1305 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1267 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | 1228 |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1255 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | 1315 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109), Yi-Lightning: 67.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1278 |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102), Yi-Lightning: 39.4 (#181)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1297 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104), Yi-Lightning: 50.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1302 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 1280 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1311 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Yi-Lightning?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Yi-Lightning better for coding?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Yi-Lightning share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Lightning has 18.