Model comparison
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs MiniMax-M2
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 7 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 37.0.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiniMax-M2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 37.4 |
| Released | 2025-11-06 | 2025-10-27 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | 1297 |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1370 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 61% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —, MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 30% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 160.6 |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1357 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 14.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1352 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69), MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1337 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109), MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1366 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1335 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | 1326 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1328 |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102), MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1331 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 1286 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1361 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than MiniMax-M2?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.4 vs 39.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and MiniMax-M2 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.