Model comparison
Hunyuan Large Vision vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 34.4.
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large Vision | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 45.8 |
| Released | — | 2025-11-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1308 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1428 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1268 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1252 | 1439 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1236 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1287 | 1456 |
| LMArena Russian | 1243 | 1391 |
| LMArena French | — | 1425 |
| LMArena German | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1357 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1330 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1406 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1251 | 1403 |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1280 | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1248 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1254 | 1414 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.3 vs 38.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.