Model comparison
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs MiMo-V2-Pro
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 32.5 to 22.1.
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2025-11-06 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | 1433 |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1476 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1447 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1478 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1469 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | 1457 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1445 |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.