Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Codex vs MiMo-V2-Pro

GPT-5.3 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Pro costs 8.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.3 Codex OpenAI

45.8

Rank #69 Reported

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Pro in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.3 Codex leads 48.6 to 43.8.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.3 Codex.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 400K.

Side by side

GPT-5.3 Codex and MiMo-V2-Pro specifications
GPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Pro
ProviderOpenAIXiaomi
Noometry Index45.843.0
Released2026-02-052026-03-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window400K1.05M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$1.75$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$14$0.87
Results tracked823

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.3 Codex leads

GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.6 (#56), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena WebDev14091433
ALE-Bench1,655785.17
SWE-bench Verified74.8%—
WeirdML79.3%—
LMArena Coding—1476

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.0 (#9), MiMo-V2-Pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Pro
Terminal-Bench78.4%—
METR Time Horizons74.5%—
Vending-Bench 25,940—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Pro
NYT Connections (extended)—25.8%
Thematic Generalization—45.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1457
Epoch Capabilities Index156.77—

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Math—1447

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Expert—1478

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Non-English—1416
LMArena Chinese—1456
LMArena French—1469
LMArena German—1417
LMArena Japanese—1366
LMArena Korean—1400
LMArena Russian—1427
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following—1445

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Pro
CL-bench—15.7%
CL-bench Life—6.9%
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Text—1436
LMArena Creative Writing—1415
LMArena Multi-Turn—1456

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.3 Codex better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

GPT-5.3 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Pro costs 8.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Codex or MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; GPT-5.3 Codex lists at $1.75 and $14.

Is GPT-5.3 Codex or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 43.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Codex and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Codex has 8 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper