Model comparison
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 45.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 3 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 53.2 to 38.1.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 45.4 | 46.7 |
| Released | 2025-11-06 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | 1618 |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1538 |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1511 |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1497 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1548 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1265 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | 1532 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1481 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1356 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1329 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1407 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1490 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1500 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1373 | 1465 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1463 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 45.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.