Noometry

Model comparison

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Llama 2-70B

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo Moonshot AI

45.8

Rank #70 Confirmed

Llama 2-70B Meta

24.4

Rank #349 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 7.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 83.1% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and 0% for Llama 2-70B.

Side by side

Kimi K2 Thinking TurboLlama 2-70B
ProviderMoonshot AIMeta
Noometry Index45.824.4
Released2025-11-062023-07-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2135

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178), Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286)

BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboLlama 2-70B
LMArena Coding14541079
LMArena WebDev1322—

Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75), Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325)

BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboLlama 2-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts14281073
Chess Puzzles20%—
DTBench—41.6%
BIG-Bench Hard—64.9%
CommonsenseQA 2.0—50%
Epoch Capabilities Index—113.79
ForecastBench—51.4
HellaSwag—85.3%
LAMBADA—78.9%
PIQA—82.8%
WinoGrande—80.2%

Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68), Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326)

BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboLlama 2-70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202583.1%0%
LMArena Math14291091
MATH Level 5—3.3%
GSM8K—69.6%

Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69), Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310)

BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboLlama 2-70B
GPQA Diamond84.2%26.3%
LMArena Expert14391039
ARC (AI2) Challenge—78.3%
BoolQ—88.6%
MMLU—69.9%
OpenBookQA—60.2%
TriviaQA—87.6%

Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109), Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274)

BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboLlama 2-70B
LMArena Non-English13981045
LMArena Chinese1456995
LMArena French14251090
LMArena German13901041
LMArena Japanese1357927
LMArena Korean1330964
LMArena Russian13911083
LMArena Spanish14061143

Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109), Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278)

BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboLlama 2-70B
LMArena Instruction Following14031071

Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102), Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270)

BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboLlama 2-70B
LMArena Longer Query14151062

Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104), Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279)

BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboLlama 2-70B
LMArena Text14151115
LMArena Creative Writing13741075
LMArena Multi-Turn14141088

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Llama 2-70B?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Llama 2-70B better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Llama 2-70B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper