Model comparison
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Llama 13b
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 60.0 to 13.8.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 24.4 |
| Released | 2025-11-06 | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 683 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 728 |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.58 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68), Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 838 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —, Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109), Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | — |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109), Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 781 |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | — |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104), Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 753 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Llama 13b?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Llama 13b better for coding?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Llama 13b share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.