Model comparison
Command R+ vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 32.5 to 9.2.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 45.8 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2025-11-06 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1428 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1439 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | 1425 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | 1357 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 1330 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1391 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1406 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1403 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1414 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R+ or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.