Model comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Yi-34B
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 45.7 to 7.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 73.2% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 14.7% for Yi-34B.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | 01.AI | |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 27.8 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0675 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.23 | — |
| Results tracked | 28 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1112 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1439 | 1104 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | 117.39 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1470 | 1114 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | 14.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1061 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), Yi-34B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |
Multilingual Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1421 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1176 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1081 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1050 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1070 |
| LMArena German | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 959 |
Instruction Following Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1091 |
Long Context Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1094 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1113 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Yi-34B?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Yi-34B better for coding?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Yi-34B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.