Model comparison
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 31× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.9 to 38.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 54% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 19.3% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.3 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2026-06-12 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 262K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.95 | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | 23% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.97 | 144.64 |
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 31× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.