Model comparison
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 20× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.6 to 35.0.
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.7 Code | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2026-06-12 | 2025-12-15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 262K | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.95 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 39.9 (#139)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1378 |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 26.0 (#123)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1348 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.01 | — |
Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 35.0 (#147)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1369 |
Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 37.6 (#145)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1354 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 46.0 (#158)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1320 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1382 |
| LMArena French | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1270 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1303 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1377 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 69.0 (#175)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1303 |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 39.5 (#170)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1300 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 52.5 (#169)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1348 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1319 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 20× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.
Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better for coding?
Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 18.