Model comparison

Granite 4.2 8B vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 40.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.2 8B costs 16× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 8B IBM

40.0

Rank #143 Confirmed

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.0

Rank #90 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.6 to 37.7.
  • Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
  • Kimi K2.7 Code accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 8B and Kimi K2.7 Code specifications
Granite 4.2 8BKimi K2.7 Code
ProviderIBMMoonshot AI
Noometry Index40.043.0
Released—2026-06-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K262K
Max output118K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.06$0.95
Output $ / M tokens$0.25$4
Results tracked1119

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 39.9 (#138), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BKimi K2.7 Code
DeepSWE—30.5%
FrontierCode—30.1%
LMArena WebDev—1473
SciCode—47.5%
WeirdML—54.1%
LMArena Coding1379—
ALE-Bench—886.23

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BKimi K2.7 Code
APEX-Agents—37.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—5,083

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 25.5 (#130), Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BKimi K2.7 Code
SimpleBench—57.9%
CritPt—10%
Chess Puzzles—21%
LMArena Hard Prompts1327—
Surface Evolver Bench—48.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—150.01

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BKimi K2.7 Code
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—54%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 37.7 (#144), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BKimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond—87.9%
SimpleQA Verified—36.5%
LMArena Expert1380—

Multilingual Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#173), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Non-English1299—
LMArena Chinese1361—
LMArena Russian1283—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#183), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Instruction Following1298—

Long Context Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.2 (#154), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Longer Query1323—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: 49.8 (#183), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text1319—
LMArena Creative Writing1238—
LMArena Multi-Turn1299—

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 40.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.2 8B costs 16× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.

Is Granite 4.2 8B or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2.7 Code does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper