Model comparison

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Llama 2-70B

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Llama 2-70B Meta

24.4

Rank #349 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 2-70B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 7.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 95.6% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 0% for Llama 2-70B.

Side by side

Kimi K2.7 Code and Llama 2-70B specifications
Kimi K2.7 CodeLlama 2-70B
ProviderMoonshot AIMeta
Noometry Index43.324.4
Released2026-06-122023-07-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.95—
Output $ / M tokens$4—
Results tracked1935

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95), Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeLlama 2-70B
DeepSWE30.5%—
FrontierCode30.1%—
LMArena WebDev1473—
SciCode47.5%—
WeirdML54.1%—
LMArena Coding—1079
ALE-Bench886.23—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122), Llama 2-70B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeLlama 2-70B
APEX-Agents37.6%—
GBAEval0.9%—
Vending-Bench 25,083—

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61), Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeLlama 2-70B
Epoch Capabilities Index149.97113.79
SimpleBench57.9%—
CritPt10%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1073
DTBench—41.6%
Surface Evolver Bench48.8%—
BIG-Bench Hard—64.9%
CommonsenseQA 2.0—50%
ForecastBench—51.4
HellaSwag—85.3%
LAMBADA—78.9%
PIQA—82.8%
WinoGrande—80.2%

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48), Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeLlama 2-70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%0%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)54%—
FrontierMath Tier 412.2%—
LMArena Math—1091
MATH Level 5—3.3%
GSM8K—69.6%

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57), Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeLlama 2-70B
GPQA Diamond87.9%26.3%
SimpleQA Verified36.5%—
LMArena Expert—1039
ARC (AI2) Challenge—78.3%
BoolQ—88.6%
MMLU—69.9%
OpenBookQA—60.2%
TriviaQA—87.6%

Multilingual Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeLlama 2-70B
LMArena Non-English—1045
LMArena Chinese—995
LMArena French—1090
LMArena German—1041
LMArena Japanese—927
LMArena Korean—964
LMArena Russian—1083
LMArena Spanish—1143

Instruction Following Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeLlama 2-70B
LMArena Instruction Following—1071

Long Context Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeLlama 2-70B
LMArena Longer Query—1062

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeLlama 2-70B
LMArena Text—1115
LMArena Creative Writing—1075
LMArena Multi-Turn—1088

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Llama 2-70B?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Llama 2-70B better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Llama 2-70B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper