Model comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Llama 2-70B

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT Google

43.5

Rank #92 Confirmed

Llama 2-70B Meta

24.4

Rank #349 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 47.6 to 8.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 82.2% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 0% for Llama 2-70B.

Side by side

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Llama 2-70B specifications
Gemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 2-70B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index43.524.4
Released2026-04-022023-07-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.0675—
Output $ / M tokens$0.23—
Results tracked2835

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 2-70B
LMArena Coding14471079
LMArena WebDev1359—
SciCode40%—
WeirdML35.2%—
ALE-Bench927.17—

Reasoning Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 2-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts14391073
DTBench74.9%41.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index141.85113.79
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
LMCA29.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard—64.9%
CommonsenseQA 2.0—50%
ForecastBench—51.4
HellaSwag—85.3%
LAMBADA—78.9%
PIQA—82.8%
WinoGrande—80.2%

Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 2-70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202582.2%0%
LMArena Math14701091
MATH Level 5—3.3%
GSM8K—69.6%

Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 2-70B
GPQA Diamond73.2%26.3%
LMArena Expert14471039
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—78.3%
BoolQ—88.6%
MMLU—69.9%
OpenBookQA—60.2%
TriviaQA—87.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), Llama 2-70B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 2-70B
LMArena Vision1260—

Multilingual Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 2-70B
LMArena Non-English14211045
LMArena Chinese1495995
LMArena French14601090
LMArena Russian14341083
LMArena Spanish14171143
LMArena German—1041
LMArena Japanese—927
LMArena Korean—964

Instruction Following Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 2-70B
LMArena Instruction Following14201071

Long Context Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 2-70B
LMArena Longer Query14281062

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 2-70B
LMArena Text14341115
LMArena Creative Writing14021075
LMArena Multi-Turn14411088
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1305—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Llama 2-70B?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Llama 2-70B better for coding?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Llama 2-70B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper