Model comparison

Kimi K2.6 vs Step 3

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI

47.7

Rank #60 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

40.5

Rank #149 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.6 scores higher in 8 categories and Step 3 in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.6 leads 57.0 to 37.6.

Side by side

Kimi K2.6 and Step 3 specifications
Kimi K2.6Step 3
ProviderMoonshot AIStepFun
Noometry Index47.740.5
Released2026-04-20—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.95—
Output $ / M tokens$4—
Results tracked5117

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 50.7 (#43), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Step 3
LMArena Coding14881367
SWE-bench Verified76.7%—
LMArena WebDev1509—
SciCode53.5%—
WeirdML55.9%—
ALE-Bench1,093—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2.6: 21.9 (#137), Step 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Step 3
OSWorld 2.04.6%—
ExploitBench18.4%—
GBAEval0.9%—
GDP.pdf12%—
Vending-Bench 26,205—

Reasoning Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 40.5 (#55), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Step 3
LMArena Hard Prompts14701355
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.3%
NYT Connections (extended)87.2%—
CritPt8%—
Chess Puzzles26%—
EBR-Bench2.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles18%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA37.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index151.05—

Math Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 57.0 (#41), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

Knowledge Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 54.0 (#54), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Step 3
LMArena Expert14911333
GPQA Diamond90.8%—
SimpleQA Verified34.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.8%—

Multimodal Step 3 leads

Kimi K2.6: 31.6 (#103), Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Step 3
LMArena Vision12831177
Blueprint-Bench 23.9%—
Furniture Assembly21.7%—
LMArena Document1451—

Multilingual Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 54.9 (#37), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Step 3
LMArena Non-English14461327
LMArena Chinese15211397
LMArena German14501371
LMArena Korean14271269
LMArena Russian14461331
LMArena Spanish14641371
LMArena French1471—
LMArena Japanese1443—

Instruction Following Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 76.3 (#43), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Step 3
LMArena Instruction Following14511332

Long Context Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#52), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Step 3
LMArena Longer Query14681326

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 68.5 (#26), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Step 3
LMArena Text14551350
LMArena Creative Writing14341321
LMArena Multi-Turn14531341
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1725—
EQ-Bench 41202—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.6 better than Step 3?

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2.6 or Step 3 better for coding?

Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.7 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.6 and Step 3 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.6 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper