Model comparison
Kimi K2.6 vs MiniMax M1
Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax M1 costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.6's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.6 scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax M1 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.6 leads 57.0 to 37.5.
- MiniMax M1 is cheaper at $0.55 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.6.
- MiniMax M1 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.6 | MiniMax M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 47.7 | 40.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-20 | 2025-06-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 262K | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.95 | $0.55 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 51 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.6 leads
Kimi K2.6: 50.7 (#43), MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1359 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 76.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1509 | — |
| SciCode | 53.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 55.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,093 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.6: 21.9 (#137), MiniMax M1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | 4.6% | — |
| ExploitBench | 18.4% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 12% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 6,205 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.6 leads
Kimi K2.6: 40.5 (#55), MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1470 | 1339 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 87.2% | — |
| CritPt | 8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 26% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 2.4% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 18% | — |
| DTBench | 90.9% | — |
| LMCA | 37.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.05 | — |
Math Kimi K2.6 leads
Kimi K2.6: 57.0 (#41), MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1361 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 57.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 25.6% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 72.9% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 96.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2.6 leads
Kimi K2.6: 54.0 (#54), MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | 1317 |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 34.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.6: 31.6 (#103), MiniMax M1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1283 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 3.9% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 21.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1451 | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2.6 leads
Kimi K2.6: 54.9 (#37), MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1446 | 1319 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1521 | 1360 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 1370 |
| LMArena German | 1450 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1443 | 1217 |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | 1266 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1329 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1464 | 1353 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.6 leads
Kimi K2.6: 76.3 (#43), MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1451 | 1312 |
Long Context Kimi K2.6 leads
Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#52), MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1468 | 1326 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.6 leads
Kimi K2.6: 68.5 (#26), MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1434 | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1335 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1725 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1202 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.6 better than MiniMax M1?
Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax M1 costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.6's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or MiniMax M1?
MiniMax M1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.55 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.6 lists at $0.95 and $4.
Is Kimi K2.6 or MiniMax M1 better for coding?
Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.7 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiniMax M1 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.6 and MiniMax M1 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.6 has 51 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.