Model comparison

Kimi K2.6 vs Palm 2

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI

47.5

Rank #52 Confirmed

Palm 2 Google

29.4

Rank #296 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.6 scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.6 leads 68.7 to 25.7.
  • Kimi K2.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Kimi K2.6 and Palm 2 specifications
Kimi K2.6Palm 2
ProviderMoonshot AIGoogle
Noometry Index47.529.4
Released2026-04-20—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.95—
Output $ / M tokens$4—
Results tracked5110

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 50.5 (#41), Palm 2: 28.5 (#306)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Palm 2
LMArena Coding1488995
SWE-bench Verified76.7%—
LMArena WebDev1509—
SciCode53.5%—
WeirdML55.9%—
ALE-Bench1,093—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2.6: 21.8 (#128), Palm 2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Palm 2
OSWorld 2.04.6%—
ExploitBench18.4%—
GBAEval0.9%—
GDP.pdf12%—
Vending-Bench 26,205—

Reasoning Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 39.6 (#51), Palm 2: 18.2 (#270)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Palm 2
LMArena Hard Prompts14701005
NYT Connections (extended)87.2%—
CritPt8%—
Chess Puzzles26%—
EBR-Bench2.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles18%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA37.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index151.03—

Math Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 56.8 (#34), Palm 2: 28.4 (#229)

Knowledge Not comparable

Kimi K2.6: 53.9 (#48), Palm 2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Palm 2
GPQA Diamond90.8%—
SimpleQA Verified34.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.8%—
LMArena Expert1491—

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K2.6: 31.8 (#95), Palm 2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Palm 2
LMArena Vision1282—
Blueprint-Bench 23.9%—
Furniture Assembly21.7%—
LMArena Document1451—

Multilingual Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 55.1 (#35), Palm 2: 21.1 (#290)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Palm 2
LMArena Non-English1446916
LMArena Chinese1521887
LMArena French1471—
LMArena German1449—
LMArena Japanese1442—
LMArena Korean1428—
LMArena Russian1446—
LMArena Spanish1463—

Instruction Following Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 76.5 (#40), Palm 2: 51.3 (#291)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Palm 2
LMArena Instruction Following14511010

Long Context Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#50), Palm 2: 30.7 (#280)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Palm 2
LMArena Longer Query14681010

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.6 leads

Kimi K2.6: 68.7 (#25), Palm 2: 25.7 (#299)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Palm 2
LMArena Text14551027
LMArena Creative Writing1434991
LMArena Multi-Turn1453994
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1725—
EQ-Bench 41202—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.6 better than Palm 2?

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2.6 or Palm 2 better for coding?

Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.5 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.6 and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.6 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper