Model comparison
Kimi K2.6 vs Laguna M.1
Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
PoolsideSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.6 scores higher in 3 categories and Laguna M.1 in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.6 leads 57.0 to 21.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 16% for Kimi K2.6 and 0% for Laguna M.1.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.6 | Laguna M.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Poolside |
| Noometry Index | 47.7 | 32.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-20 | 2026-04-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 262K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.95 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 51 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.6 leads
Kimi K2.6: 50.7 (#43), Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1509 | 1349 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 76.7% | — |
| SciCode | 53.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 55.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,093 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.6: 21.9 (#137), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | 4.6% | — |
| ExploitBench | 18.4% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 12% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 6,205 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.6 leads
Kimi K2.6: 40.5 (#55), Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 87.2% | — |
| CritPt | 8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 26% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 2.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1470 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 18% | — |
| DTBench | 90.9% | — |
| LMCA | 37.3% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.05 | — |
Math Kimi K2.6 leads
Kimi K2.6: 57.0 (#41), Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 16% | 0% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 57.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 25.6% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 72.9% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 96.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1475 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Kimi K2.6: 54.0 (#54), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 34.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.6: 31.6 (#103), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1283 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 3.9% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 21.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1451 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2.6: 54.9 (#37), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1521 | — |
| LMArena French | 1471 | — |
| LMArena German | 1450 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1464 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2.6: 76.3 (#43), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1451 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#52), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1468 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2.6: 68.5 (#26), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1434 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1725 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1202 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.6 better than Laguna M.1?
Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.6 or Laguna M.1 better for coding?
Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.7 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.6 and Laguna M.1 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.6 has 51 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.